2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing visual and auditory presentation for the modification of interpretation bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Salemink, van den Hout, and Kindt (2007a) reported that having participants practise making positive inferences about social situations influenced later social interpretations but failed to reduce the anxiety elicited by the later experience of test failure. A similar absence of congruent emotional effects of social training on giving a speech was reported by Standage, Ashwin, and Fox (2009). In an unpublished series of experiments, we (Mackintosh, Mathews, Hoppitt, & Eckstein, 2010) also found that training with either positive social or test outcomes (e.g., you have to give a difficult presentation but it eventually goes well) actually tended to worsen the deleterious emotional consequences of later failure on difficult cognitive tasks.…”
Section: When Does Interpretation Training Generalise To Other Tasks supporting
confidence: 77%
“…For example, Salemink, van den Hout, and Kindt (2007a) reported that having participants practise making positive inferences about social situations influenced later social interpretations but failed to reduce the anxiety elicited by the later experience of test failure. A similar absence of congruent emotional effects of social training on giving a speech was reported by Standage, Ashwin, and Fox (2009). In an unpublished series of experiments, we (Mackintosh, Mathews, Hoppitt, & Eckstein, 2010) also found that training with either positive social or test outcomes (e.g., you have to give a difficult presentation but it eventually goes well) actually tended to worsen the deleterious emotional consequences of later failure on difficult cognitive tasks.…”
Section: When Does Interpretation Training Generalise To Other Tasks supporting
confidence: 77%
“…This plasticity of interpretative style has been reported in individuals with varying anxiety levels (MacLeod, Koster, & Fox, 2009). These data also show that induced interpretative styles generate differences in anxious mood after training (Mathews & Mackintosh, 2000;Mathews, Ridgeway, Cook, & Yiend, 2007;Salemink, van den Hout, & Kindt, 2007;Standage, Ashwin, & Fox, 2009) and in response to symptom provocation (Hirsch, Hayes, & Mathews, 2009;Murphy, Hirsch, Mathews, Smith, & Clark, 2007;Wilson, MacLeod, Mathews, & Rutherford, 2006). Thus compared to negatively-trained participants, positively-trained participants show reductions in anxious responses to naturally-occurring stressors or psychological challenges.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As adolescents were told that the task involved reading a number of scenarios, our volunteer sample may have self-selected on the basis of reading ability. To examine training effects in a broader range of adolescents with differing cognitive capacities, including younger participants, future studies could develop auditory training tasks, although caution over differences as a function of training modality needs to be considered [62]. Second, adolescents assigned to positive training reported significantly higher mean negative affect prior to bias induction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%