2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
92
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…(Chu et al, 2007). This method is used to optimize multi-criteria complex systems (Opricovic, 1998(Opricovic, , 2002.…”
Section: Shannon Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Chu et al, 2007). This method is used to optimize multi-criteria complex systems (Opricovic, 1998(Opricovic, , 2002.…”
Section: Shannon Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu nedenle kriterlerin ağırlıklandırılmasında ele alınan problemin doğasına ve niteliğine bağlı olarak, farklı yöntemler kullanılabilir. Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP), Eigen Vektör, Entropy gibi yöntemler kriterlerin ağırlıklandırılmasında kullanılan yöntemlerden bazılarıdır (Chu, 2007(Chu, : 1015.…”
Section: Veri Seti Ve Yöntemunclassified
“…The TOPSIS approach is based on the idea that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution (PIS) and the farthest from the negative ideal solution (NIS) for solving multiple-criteria decision making problems. In short, the ideal solution is composed of all the best criteria, whereas the negative ideal solution is composed of all the worst attainable criteria (Chu et al, 2007). The TOPSIS procedure consists of the following steps (Tzeng et al, 2005) (Chen, 2001).…”
Section: Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solutimentioning
confidence: 99%