2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iacc.2016.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Analysis of a Biomedical Image for Compression Using Various Transform Coding Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many methods to compress image data including prediction-based, transformation-based, and other methods such as fractal image compression and deep learning with Auto Encoder (AE) [1,2], Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [3], and Residual Neural Network (RestNet) [4]. The transformation-based method includes Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), Karhunen-Loeve Transform (KLT), Hadamard transform, Slant transform, Haar transform, and singular value decomposition [5]. Usually, transformation-based or deep learning methods are used in lossy compression while prediction-based methods are used for lossless compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods to compress image data including prediction-based, transformation-based, and other methods such as fractal image compression and deep learning with Auto Encoder (AE) [1,2], Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [3], and Residual Neural Network (RestNet) [4]. The transformation-based method includes Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), Karhunen-Loeve Transform (KLT), Hadamard transform, Slant transform, Haar transform, and singular value decomposition [5]. Usually, transformation-based or deep learning methods are used in lossy compression while prediction-based methods are used for lossless compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%