2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48923-0_71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Analysis of Steel and Tungsten Carbide Rockwell B Hardness Ball Indenters Utilizing a General Purpose Finite Element Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is due to the greater penetration depth of the steel ball indenter into the specimen due to greater deformation of both the indenter itself and the specimen, which was confirmed experimentally. The calculated hardness values differ by less value than the expanded uncertainty on the Rockwell HRBW scale for the national Rockwell hardness measurement standard [15]. This fact makes it possible to use both steel and carbide-tungsten ball indenters in measurements (comparisons) when using one type of indenter over the entire experiment or comparison.…”
Section: The Study Of the Specific Features Of Measurements On The Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is due to the greater penetration depth of the steel ball indenter into the specimen due to greater deformation of both the indenter itself and the specimen, which was confirmed experimentally. The calculated hardness values differ by less value than the expanded uncertainty on the Rockwell HRBW scale for the national Rockwell hardness measurement standard [15]. This fact makes it possible to use both steel and carbide-tungsten ball indenters in measurements (comparisons) when using one type of indenter over the entire experiment or comparison.…”
Section: The Study Of the Specific Features Of Measurements On The Romentioning
confidence: 99%