2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-018-3413-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and analysis on lunar rotation with lunar gravity field models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1, the GRGM series models have already reached an unprecedented level of accuracy and resolution with the inclusion of the GRAIL data set. Although the GRGM series models have very high resolution, there are still discrepancies in the low degree coefficients and long-wavelength components of the solutions developed by two space research centers (JPL and GSFC) (Yan et al 2018). The fourth Chinese lunar probe, Chang'e 5T1, was launched on October 23, 2014, with the goal of testing the Earth atmosphere reentry technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 1, the GRGM series models have already reached an unprecedented level of accuracy and resolution with the inclusion of the GRAIL data set. Although the GRGM series models have very high resolution, there are still discrepancies in the low degree coefficients and long-wavelength components of the solutions developed by two space research centers (JPL and GSFC) (Yan et al 2018). The fourth Chinese lunar probe, Chang'e 5T1, was launched on October 23, 2014, with the goal of testing the Earth atmosphere reentry technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this state of motion, any deviation from uniform orbital motion affects the rotational motion immediately, and vice versa. For this reason, the orbital motion and rotational motion of the Moon is usually integrated simultaneously (Folkner et al 2008(Folkner et al , 2014Viswanathan et al 2017;Yang et al 2018). However, due to a lack of observational data of Phobos, the orbital perturbations have only been deliberated in Chapront-Touzé (1990), and Phobos' rotation rate is set to match the orbit's mean longitude rate (synchronous rotation) in generating Phobos's numerical ephemerides (Lainey et al 2007(Lainey et al , 2016Jacobson 2010).…”
Section: Model Of Phobos' Orbitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the librations of Phobos numerically, we integrated the numerical equations via single-step Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg (RKF) and multi-steps Adams-Bashforth-Moulton (ABM) (Yang et al 2018), the integration step is set at 1/24 day (1 h). The initial values of Phobos' rotation are quoted from Archinal & Acton (2018).…”
Section: Forced Librationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Moon is a not perfectly rigid body, we consider three coordinate axes to be along the axes of principal moments of inertia of the mantle and the instantaneous angular velocity ω utilized to describe it in an inertial refer-ence system. We refer to Yang et al (2018Yang et al ( , 2017 for full descriptions. As displayed in Figure 2, OX i (i = 1, 2, 3) is defined, where OX 1 is along the minimum moment of inertia axis and OX 3 is the maximum moment of inertia axis.…”
Section: Numerical Model and Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the rotational equations of the Euler angles are applied to describe the Moon's orientation with respect to (w.r.t.) the inertial coordinate system (Yang et al 2018;Viswanathan et al 2017;Pavlov et al 2016;Folkner et al 2014;Cappallo et al 1981). Based on the integration approach implemented independently, the difference between a one-layer and two-layer lunar model and precise position of Earth's pole in calculating the figure interaction between Earth and Moon is analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%