2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and impact of COVID-19 for patients with cancer: a survival analysis of fatality rate controlling for age, sex and cancer type

Abstract: ObjectivesPrior research has reported an increased risk of fatality for patients with cancer, but most studies investigated the risk by comparing cancer to non-cancer patients among COVID-19 infections, where cancer might have contributed to the increased risk. This study is to understand COVID-19’s imposed HR of fatality while controlling for covariates, such as age, sex, metastasis status and cancer type.MethodsWe conducted survival analyses of 4606 cancer patients with COVID-19 test results from 16 March to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth stressing that, out of the full cohort, 342 patients presented severe COVID-19 (according to the pre-established definition), 28 where over two-thirds of the patients required hospitalization. We observed that the mortality for this specific subgroup was 31.9%, similar to the results reported by Desai et al 29 25 Cancer is a heterogeneous disease, where besides the treatment type, primary tumor subtype, stage, age, and gender also play a role. 30 Another limitation is that the presented results on cancer patients with COVID-19 in Mexico cannot be generalized to the whole Mexican population due to most of the data coming from the National Cancer Institute, which is one of the largest oncology centers of the country.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth stressing that, out of the full cohort, 342 patients presented severe COVID-19 (according to the pre-established definition), 28 where over two-thirds of the patients required hospitalization. We observed that the mortality for this specific subgroup was 31.9%, similar to the results reported by Desai et al 29 25 Cancer is a heterogeneous disease, where besides the treatment type, primary tumor subtype, stage, age, and gender also play a role. 30 Another limitation is that the presented results on cancer patients with COVID-19 in Mexico cannot be generalized to the whole Mexican population due to most of the data coming from the National Cancer Institute, which is one of the largest oncology centers of the country.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…27 The same behavior was noted with hematologic versus solid tumors: univariate analysis detected that the frequency of death in hematologic tumors was higher (p = 0.020). However, after the multivariate analysis, the difference did not withhold its significance and the odds of death were not increased unlike other studies 9,19,21,25 maybe as a consequence of the high rate of hematological patients on surveillance (34.3%). On the contrary, subjective symptoms such as vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain could be attributed not only to the oncological treatment and the cancer itself but also to COVID-19, and despite we are unable to identify the cause, we found that nausea increased the odds of death.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted cancer patients for several reasons, including the difficulty for cancer patients to maintain full access to the healthcare system [ 10 ]. Very early at the start of the pandemic, cancer patients have been pointed out as a population at higher risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 [ 2 , 11 ], and at higher risk of severe infection and death from COVID-19 [ 5 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%