2012
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v4n7p51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Improvement of Different Methods of RNA Isolation from Strawberry (Fragria * ananassa)

Abstract: Isolation of high-quality RNA from different strawberry tissues is often affected by the presence of high levels of contamination by polysaccharides and phenolic compounds. By the methods of improved CTAB, SDS, and guanidinium thiocyanate, total RNA was isolated from leaves of strawberry. The result indicated that total RNA is of high quality and undegraded by using CTAB. However, it was difficult to isolate total RNA from leaves of strawberry by using guanidinium thiocyanate, and total RNA could be extracted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extraction of total RNA from inoculated root tissue was performed similarly to the previously described 3% CTAB 3 method (Yu et al, 2012). Briefly, plant material was disrupted under liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle, previously decontaminated through cleaning with RNaseZap TM solution and baking for 2 h at 230 • C to deactivate RNAse enzymes.…”
Section: Inoculation Time Course Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extraction of total RNA from inoculated root tissue was performed similarly to the previously described 3% CTAB 3 method (Yu et al, 2012). Briefly, plant material was disrupted under liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle, previously decontaminated through cleaning with RNaseZap TM solution and baking for 2 h at 230 • C to deactivate RNAse enzymes.…”
Section: Inoculation Time Course Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, plant material was disrupted under liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle, previously decontaminated through cleaning with RNaseZap TM solution and baking for 2 h at 230 • C to deactivate RNAse enzymes. This material was transferred to a warmed extraction buffer (Yu et al, 2012) containing β-mercaptoethanol with 0.01 g of PVPP added per 0.1 g of frozen tissue. The remaining steps were performed as previously described (Yu et al, 2012), except that 60 µL DEPC-treated H 2 O was used to elute RNA.…”
Section: Inoculation Time Course Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total RNA was extracted three times from 0.4 g of each sample with CTBA based extraction buffer, according to the protocol of Yu et al (2012). The quality and purity of the total RNA was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrometry (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific).…”
Section: Relative Gene Expression Assessed By Quantitative Rt-pcr (Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(PVP)/β-mercaptoethanol: method indicated for strawberry tissue (Fragaria × ananassa), according to Yu et al (2012) (3% CTAB, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 5% PVP e 1% β-mercaptoetanol) were added to a sterile tube containing 700 µl of extraction buffer (PVP and 1% β-mercaptoethanol), homogenized and incubated at 60 °C for 10 min. The sample was centrifuged at 15,700 g for 5 min.…”
Section: ) Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (Ctab)/ Polyvinylpyrrolidonementioning
confidence: 99%