2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2241386/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Modification of Various Turbulence Models for Analysis of Fluid Microjet Injection into the Boundary Layer over a Flat Surface

Abstract: The present work studied various models for predicting turbulence in the problem of injecting a fluid microjet into the boundary layer of a turbulent flow. For this purpose, the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras (SA), two-equation k-ε and k-ω, multi-equation transition k-kL-ω, transition shear stress transport (SST), and Reynolds stress models were used for solving the steady microjet into the turbulent boundary layer, and their results are compared with experimental results. A comparison of the results indicated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is commonly used in aerodynamic problems and is very suitable for predicting pressure gradients within the boundary layer [22]. The y + corresponding to this model is very low (y + < 5), which allows it to accurately predict aerodynamic properties close to the boundary layer compared to 2-equation models such as k − , whose y + is higher (y + < 30) [44][45][46].…”
Section: Determination Of Aerodynamic Coefficients By Means Of Cfd 22...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is commonly used in aerodynamic problems and is very suitable for predicting pressure gradients within the boundary layer [22]. The y + corresponding to this model is very low (y + < 5), which allows it to accurately predict aerodynamic properties close to the boundary layer compared to 2-equation models such as k − , whose y + is higher (y + < 30) [44][45][46].…”
Section: Determination Of Aerodynamic Coefficients By Means Of Cfd 22...mentioning
confidence: 99%