2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between a Case-Matched Analysis of Left Upper Lobe Trisegmentectomy and Left Upper Lobectomy for Small Size Lung Cancer Located in the Upper Division

Abstract: LTS may be suitable as a standard treatment if the tumor is small and the suspected margins are well away from the lingula.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Witte et al 12 reported the results of a pair matched control study of 66 patients affected by NSCLC comparing lobectomies and multi-segmentectomies; in their experience, the median diameter of the tumor was similar to ours, but they also considered patients with positive node involvement; although authors did not report analysis of outcomes according to the pathological stage, they did not find differences in terms of neither survival nor recurrence rate between the two types of procedures. Consequently, authors conclude that multi-segmentectomies can be an oncologically safe procedures for NSCLC and they define left upper lobectomy as a possible overtreatment for some patients; the same similar conclusions are shared by two others studies by Soukiasian 29 and Iwasaki 30 ; both studies were focused on stage I tumors only. In our study, oncological outcomes in the two groups were comparable and no difference in both overall survival (P = 0.825) and disease-free interval (P = 0.565) were found; furthermore, both univariate and multivariate analyses of OS and DFI confirmed that procedure (lobectomy vs multi-segmentectomy) was not a significant prognostic factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Recently, Witte et al 12 reported the results of a pair matched control study of 66 patients affected by NSCLC comparing lobectomies and multi-segmentectomies; in their experience, the median diameter of the tumor was similar to ours, but they also considered patients with positive node involvement; although authors did not report analysis of outcomes according to the pathological stage, they did not find differences in terms of neither survival nor recurrence rate between the two types of procedures. Consequently, authors conclude that multi-segmentectomies can be an oncologically safe procedures for NSCLC and they define left upper lobectomy as a possible overtreatment for some patients; the same similar conclusions are shared by two others studies by Soukiasian 29 and Iwasaki 30 ; both studies were focused on stage I tumors only. In our study, oncological outcomes in the two groups were comparable and no difference in both overall survival (P = 0.825) and disease-free interval (P = 0.565) were found; furthermore, both univariate and multivariate analyses of OS and DFI confirmed that procedure (lobectomy vs multi-segmentectomy) was not a significant prognostic factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…One of the key findings of the present study was that the numbers of CTCs in patients with SPNs that were early-stage NSCLC were associated with the location of the nodule in the upper lobe of the lung and the age of the patients but not the type of nodule or the pathological type. Thus, lung cancer is more commonly identified in the upper lobe of the lung [32]. However, the underlying mechanism requires further functional investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although thoracoscopic lobectomy has achieved increased safety and utilization over the past several years, thoracoscopic segmentectomy has merely been superficially mentioned in the literature [3]. In a case matched study [20], it was described that left upper trisegmentectomy may be a suitable standard treatment if the tumor is small and the suspected margins are well away from the lingula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%