2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.105.035305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between a quantum annealer and a classical approximation algorithm for computing the ground state of an Ising spin glass

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yaacoby et al. [41] indicate that one can reach the ground state of the spin glass through the QA only if the system can regain its ergodicity in the presence of quantum fluctuations. However, it is not the sufficient condition to ensure the quantum speed up over the classical algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yaacoby et al. [41] indicate that one can reach the ground state of the spin glass through the QA only if the system can regain its ergodicity in the presence of quantum fluctuations. However, it is not the sufficient condition to ensure the quantum speed up over the classical algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the ergodicity in the spin glass phase through the phenomenon of quantum tunnelling across the free energy barriers, is the potential reason behind the success of the QA in such ergodic spin glass region. Yaacoby et al [41] indicate that one can reach the ground state of the spin glass through the QA only if the system can regain its ergodicity in the presence of quantum fluctuations. However, it is not the sufficient condition to ensure the quantum speed up over the classical algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data fits to npexp[(tt0)/τ] with τ9.7 years. We have marked some of the notable events: BKC denotes Chakrabarti [101]; GL denotes Goldschmidt and Lai [38]; WER denotes Wu et al [4]; CDS denotes Chakrabarti et al [102]; KGL denotes Kao et al [103]; ASA denotes Ancona-Torres et al [48]; SIC denotes Suzuki et al [104]; MRC denotes Mukherjee et al [105]; LMR denotes Leschke et al [106]; YSK denotes Yaacoby et al [107]; SGS denotes Schindler et al [108]. The inset shows direct functional relationship between np and t for category A from 1980 to 2021.…”
Section: Research Network and Study Of Its Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This role of quantum tunneling was first discussed by Ray et al, in 1989 [16] (see discussions in [17]) in this regard) in the context of the restoration of the replica symmetry or ergodicity due to quantum fluctuation in the quantum version of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model [18], which is detailed in the next section. Although the existence of an energy landscape with thin and high barriers in specific models is still an issue of debate, it must be a foundation for the speedup of QA over SA [17,19]. In addition, several numerical and experimental studies have provided evidences for such an advantage of QA over SA in some specific models as shown in Secs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%