2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-017-1607-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between aerated static piles and vermicomposting in producing co-compost from rural organic wastes and cow manure

Abstract: In this study, the process of producing compost from rural separated solid wastes using aerated static piles (ASP) and vermicomposting was investigated which was carried out from September 2015 to January 2016. A combination of waste ingredients, conditions, processing duration, analysis of key parameters (moisture, pH, temperature and C/N ratio) governing the process, the quality of the final product and economic assessment was considered. Six piles were created in the ASP method, and six piles were loaded in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tarp was propped on stakes set at the corners of the composting area and secured with stones on the front end to keep rainwater away from the piles and to prevent the tarp from flying away in heavy winds. Ventilation, an important component of the composting process (41,(43)(44)(45), was provided by creating space for airflow between the tarp and the enclosing net on either side of the area and at the back of the piles, which was 15 cm away from the white concrete wall. The piles were always covered with the tarp except when measuring compost characteristics once per day for 31 days.…”
Section: Rapid Composting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tarp was propped on stakes set at the corners of the composting area and secured with stones on the front end to keep rainwater away from the piles and to prevent the tarp from flying away in heavy winds. Ventilation, an important component of the composting process (41,(43)(44)(45), was provided by creating space for airflow between the tarp and the enclosing net on either side of the area and at the back of the piles, which was 15 cm away from the white concrete wall. The piles were always covered with the tarp except when measuring compost characteristics once per day for 31 days.…”
Section: Rapid Composting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final weight of each pile was approximately 60 t. The ratio of onion waste: cow dung was determined according to Rynk et al (1992) to reach a final C/N ratio of 30. Cow dung is a suitable material to help the compost in the maturity process and was previously used to composting onion waste and other organic wastes (Pellejero 2015;Abdoli et al 2019). The final ratio of onion waste:cow dung was 1.3:1 (w:w).…”
Section: Composting Method Location and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the pre-composting process, corn cob waste was placed in an experimental reactor that consisted of a plastic container measuring 35 cm wide, 35 cm long and 35 cm high, with a total volume of 0.043 m 3 . Small holes were made in the bottom base of the container to allow leachate to be extracted [22][23][24]. The reactor was covered with a thin mesh to allow gaseous exchange [25].…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%