1998
DOI: 10.1080/01904169809365476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between analytical results of plant sap analysis and the dry ashing method for tomato plants cultured hydroponically

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies focus on correlating sap K concentration to leaf K concentration and do not include correlations to yield. This is often done in exploratory studies examining new analytical methods (Gangaiah et al 2016;He et al 1998;Iseki et al 2017). Eventually, however, each new method must be correlated to yield or some metric of crop performance.…”
Section: Potassium Content In Plant Sapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies focus on correlating sap K concentration to leaf K concentration and do not include correlations to yield. This is often done in exploratory studies examining new analytical methods (Gangaiah et al 2016;He et al 1998;Iseki et al 2017). Eventually, however, each new method must be correlated to yield or some metric of crop performance.…”
Section: Potassium Content In Plant Sapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, fresh tissue tests or cell sap tests offer a rapid and convenient assessment of the nutritional status of the plant (Davis, 1995). In those methods, fresh tissue samples (mostly the leaf or petiole parts) are chopped, crushed or homogenized, and extracted with water or reagents specific for each nutrient (Westcott et al, 1993;He et al, 1998). Compared with the total analysis method, which accounts mainly for a long-term integrated accumulation of nutrients, the fresh tissue or cell tests can have advantages of reflecting relatively recent or readily available nutrient contents in the plant compartment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%