2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between artificial neural network and partial least squares for on-line visible and near infrared spectroscopy measurement of soil organic carbon, pH and clay content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
65
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kappa indices in this study (0.64 and 0.67) were classified with a high level of agreement in according to the categorical data of Landis and Koch (1977). Comparing the laboratory particle-size analysis with DRS prediction for the clay content, Kuang et al (2015) found a Kappa index of 0.48. To predict the soil texture and other properties in a semi-arid area of northern Turkey, Bilgili et al (2010) used DRS.…”
Section: Classification Of Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The Kappa indices in this study (0.64 and 0.67) were classified with a high level of agreement in according to the categorical data of Landis and Koch (1977). Comparing the laboratory particle-size analysis with DRS prediction for the clay content, Kuang et al (2015) found a Kappa index of 0.48. To predict the soil texture and other properties in a semi-arid area of northern Turkey, Bilgili et al (2010) used DRS.…”
Section: Classification Of Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The accuracy for models trained on dry spectra and tested on field moist spectra was improved. Kuang et al [107] compared the accuracy between PLSR and artificial neural networks (ANN) for online spectral measurements, and concluded that ANN provided better results in cross validation (R 2 = 0.83) compared to PLSR (R 2 = 0.71). Though using an independent dataset for calibration, the model's performance dropped significantly for both ANN and PLSR calibrations, with R 2 = 0.49 and R 2 = 0.46, respectively.…”
Section: Commercial Available In Situ Soil Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the PLSR model performed slightly worse because it was based on traditional linear regression although the information of SOC was not. Kuang et al [80] demonstrated that the ANN model performs better compared with PLSR, which may be attributed to a nonlinear behavior documented for SOC [81,82] and appeared to be overcome by the nature of ANN in solving nonlinear problems.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Model Performance In Soc Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%