2020
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1807308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Atmospheric Reanalysis Models ERA5 and ERA-Interim at the North Antarctic Peninsula Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 2 metre monthly temperature and precipitation from each reanalysis were validated against surface observations at different high-altitude sites in the central Andes. In other glacial regions such as the Antarctic Peninsula, the performance of surface ERA5 and ERA-Interim parameters were evaluated by comparing different variables with insitu observations (Hillebrand et al 2020;Tetzner et al 2019). These works concluded that ERA5 showed good skills in representing monthly temperature over glaciers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, 2 metre monthly temperature and precipitation from each reanalysis were validated against surface observations at different high-altitude sites in the central Andes. In other glacial regions such as the Antarctic Peninsula, the performance of surface ERA5 and ERA-Interim parameters were evaluated by comparing different variables with insitu observations (Hillebrand et al 2020;Tetzner et al 2019). These works concluded that ERA5 showed good skills in representing monthly temperature over glaciers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root mean square error (RMSE) is recommended for statistical analyses that combine errors with low correlation, high bias, and normal distribution(Bromwich and Fogt 2004), but this metric is sensitive to extreme values. The mean absolute error (MAE) indicates the average performance attributing the same weight to all errors and it tends to present values lower than that verified by the RMSE(Hillebrand et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, precipitation fields show low correlations and large RMSE with observations. Several studies indicated that both reanalysis products and regional models (e.g., ERA5 and RACMO) adequately capture temperature but have a poor representation of precipitation, showing strong overestimates over the Antarctic continent (e.g., Gossart et al 2019, Tetzner et al 2019, Hillebrand et al 2021). Interestingly, from 2006 onwards, the annual precipitation anomalies show good agreement with observations (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERA5 is a global intermediate spatial resolution atmospheric and oceanic dataset available for the entire globe at ~31 km horizontal resolution (Hersbach et al, 2020). Several studies indicated that the ERA5 dataset provides the most accurate depiction of the recent Antarctic climate (e.g., Gossart et al 2019, Tetzner et al 2019, Bozkurt et al 2020, Hillebrand et al 2021. RACMO is a regional climate model providing high spatial resolution (5.5 km) of atmospheric and glaciological datasets for the entire AP from 1979 to the present (Van Wessem et al 2016) (https://www.projects.…”
Section: Climatological In-situ Observations and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The least squares method is 370 a mathematical optimization technique, which uses the least square sum of residuals as the estimation standard for the best matching function. It is usually used in statistical models and is by far the most applicable and widely used parameter estimation method (Qiu and Jiang, 2021;Ge, 2015;Floyd and Braddock, 1984). Finally, Hmax and Hmin values were substituted into the derivation formula to obtain Tmax and Tmin as preliminary results for subsequent correction and 375 analysis.…”
Section: Tmax and Tmin Estimation Under Clear Sky Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%