2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4501-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Centrality Measures for a Network Based on Cascading Nature of Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TOPSIS is a commonly used approach to determine the importance of network components [42,43] as it ranks the components based on their pre-determined criteria performances [44]. We use node betweenness centrality and degree [45] as criteria to assess the core counties. Degree centrality is the number of connections each node has, and betweenness centrality is the ratio of shortest paths passing through a node's overall potential shortest paths.…”
Section: Core Nodes In Us-china Agri-food Trade Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOPSIS is a commonly used approach to determine the importance of network components [42,43] as it ranks the components based on their pre-determined criteria performances [44]. We use node betweenness centrality and degree [45] as criteria to assess the core counties. Degree centrality is the number of connections each node has, and betweenness centrality is the ratio of shortest paths passing through a node's overall potential shortest paths.…”
Section: Core Nodes In Us-china Agri-food Trade Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%