2009
DOI: 10.1080/10618560903476386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between computational fluid dynamics, fluid–structure interaction and computational structural dynamics predictions of flow-induced wall mechanics in an anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If detected by human eye, the change in geometry should be sufficient to affect computed characteristics of flow yet classic assumptions and boundary conditions may have interfered with modeling such deformations. Significant deformation was indeed detected in model systems 17, 47 configured with elastic boundaries. Rigid boundaries overestimate shear stress in IA and by definition dampen deformation.…”
Section: Parameters and Sensitivity Of Flow Simulation In Iamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…If detected by human eye, the change in geometry should be sufficient to affect computed characteristics of flow yet classic assumptions and boundary conditions may have interfered with modeling such deformations. Significant deformation was indeed detected in model systems 17, 47 configured with elastic boundaries. Rigid boundaries overestimate shear stress in IA and by definition dampen deformation.…”
Section: Parameters and Sensitivity Of Flow Simulation In Iamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…When compared against the 20% thickness, the thinner, equivalent wall-thickness produces a striking increase in the maximum principal-stress. The maximum stresses achieved with the equivalent wall-thickness fall well within a reasonable bound for cerebral aneurysms [40,41,[57][58][59].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching aneurysm wall dynamics to imaged dynamics in aneurysm replicas might provide a potential remedy. In any case, wall compliance most likely will have an effect on wall shear stress and related quantities,33 and the order of the effect will directly depend on the degree of wall motion—that is, strongly pulsating blebs will show the largest variations from computed simulations assuming rigid walls. Nevertheless, models with a rigid wall (virtual and/or 3D printed) are assumed to provide an approximation for aneurysmal hemodynamics and imaging rigid 3D models can serve as a direct validation of computational fluid dynamics results for rigid computational models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%