2024
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/19/04/p04032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between conventional Si and new generation of SiC detector for high proton energy spectrometry

L. Torrisi,
V. Havranek,
A. Mackova
et al.

Abstract: A SiC Schottky diode and a Si surface barrier detector have been compared during Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) using 2–3 MeV proton beams. Both detectors are suited to detect high energetic ions with high-energy resolution for spectroscopic analysis. The correlations between the detector parameters and the surface passivating layers, ion energy and current dependence, ion penetration depth, detection efficiency and energy resolution, are outlined. Comparative RBS analysis per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements have demonstrated that the energy resolution of SiC worsens to about 1.8% using 2 MeV protons and to 1.2% using 2 MeV helium and improves to 0.5% using 2 MeV nitrogen. Further considerations on these investigations are reported in previous papers [1,2]. Thus, heavy ion detection improves the energy resolution of SiC making it like that of a silicon detector.…”
Section: Jinst 19 P07005mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measurements have demonstrated that the energy resolution of SiC worsens to about 1.8% using 2 MeV protons and to 1.2% using 2 MeV helium and improves to 0.5% using 2 MeV nitrogen. Further considerations on these investigations are reported in previous papers [1,2]. Thus, heavy ion detection improves the energy resolution of SiC making it like that of a silicon detector.…”
Section: Jinst 19 P07005mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2) Si detector cannot operate at high temperature due to its high leakage current which becomes high for temperatures of the order of 100 • C generating a high noise and irreversibly worsening the energy resolution of the detector. Execution of RBS analyses in high-temperature conditions is not possible for the Si spectra deterioration, while they remain possible using SiC, which shows a leakage current about two order of magnitude lower than Si and a minor dependence on the temperature, according to the literature [2,7,23].…”
Section: Jinst 19 P07005mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation