Comparison between Cupper T380 IUD and Multiload 375 IUD in early post partum insertion

El-Beltagy, Nermeen; Darwish, Emad; Kasem, M.S.; Hefila, Nermeen Mohamed

doi:10.1016/j.mefs.2010.12.006

Cited by 21 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…EL Beltagy et al also reported no increase in the incidence PID after immediate postpartum IUCD insertion. 2 No case of perforation were reported from both the groups. This decrease risk of uterine perforation may be because of thick wall of the uterus.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380a) insertion: a comparative study in a referral hospital of Karnataka, India

Mohan

Ramappa

Sandesh

et al. 2015

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380a) insertion: a comparative study in a referral hospital of Karnataka, India

Mohan

Ramappa

Sandesh

et al. 2015

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…EL Beltagy et al also reported no increase in the incidence of PID after immediate postpartum IUCD insertion. 8 Thirty-eight (10.9%) women got their IUCD removed in PPIUCD group in comparison to 15 (16.6%) women in interval group (p-value >0.05). Zhou SW et al showed the removal rate of 4.6% and 4.2% for vaginal PPL and trans-caesarean PPL respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…This is in accordance with the study of Rosales et al and El Beltagy et al where no perforations were observed. 5,8 Majority of women in both the groups had easy insertion (97.17% in PPIUCD and 82.3% in interval IUCD group). Only 2.8% women in PPIUCD group and 17.6% women in interval IUCD group had difficulty at the time of insertion which is statistically significant (p-value <0.05).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Changing trends in intrauterine contraceptive device: from interval intrauterine contraceptive device to postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: a prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital in eastern Uttar Pradesh

Tyagi

Aditya

Srivastava

et al. 2016

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONThe current outburst of Indian population (1.21 billion as per 2011 census) is because of the lack of awareness and acceptance of contraception in the post-partum period. Curbing this alarming rise in population is an area of immediate concern for the health policy makers. In India, around 65% of women in the first year postpartum have an unmet need for family planning.1 Postpartum family planning services are ideal way to reposit family planning back in India. PPIUCD is one of the most effective, long term and reversible family planning method. PPIUCD can reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and abortion related complications. The objective of the study was to know the acceptance rates of post-partum IUCD, to know the reasons for discontinuation of PPIUCD in follow up period, to study the side effects and complications of PPIUCD and to compare PPIUCD with interval IUCD with respect to above. METHODSThe present study was carried among 526 women in obstetrics and gynaecology department of Nehru hospital ABSTRACT Background:The current outburst of Indian population (1.21 billion as per census 2011) is because of the lack of awareness and acceptance of contraception in the immediate postpartum period. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion can do wonders and curb this unmet need of family planning if good counselling and proper insertion techniques are followed. Methods: The present study was carried among 526 women in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology of Nehru Hospital in BRD medical college Gorakhpur, India. Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) was inserted in 424 women in PPIUCD group and in 102 women in interval IUCD group after taking proper consent and following the WHO medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use (MEC). Follow-up was done at 6 weeks and 6 months. Results: The acceptance rate of PPIUCD was 30.34% as compared to 18% in interval IUCD group (p-value <0.05). The chief reason for declining the use of IUCD was fear of excessive pain and bleeding (26.3%). Long term reversible method (32%) was the main reason given for accepting IUCD. There was no perforation or any other major complication at the time of insertion in both the groups. Rate of expulsion was 5.7% in PPIUCD and 2.22% in interval IUCD group p-value (>0.05). Conclusions: PPIUCD is a safe, effective, feasible and reversible method of contraception. It should be made a part of family health care programmes in India.

show abstract

“…[8][9][10] The aim and objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the continuation and expulsion rates of post placental insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 intrauterine contraceptive devices. To identify the factors affecting the continuation and expulsion rates of intrauterine contraceptive devices.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A study to evaluate and compare the expulsion and continuation rates of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT 380A in Indian women at a premier hospital in New Delhi, India

Kumar¹,

Kumar

Aggarwal

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Study was planned to evaluate and compare the expulsion and continuation rates of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT380A in Indian women at Safdarjung Hospital New Delhi, after approval was obtained from Institutional Ethical committee.Methods: Study group consisted of 300 women, divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. The data was analysed by using ‘student “t” test/ non-parametric ‘Wilcoxon Mann Whitney’ for quantitative variables to evaluate the safety, efficacy and acceptability.Results: Mean age was 24.99 years (range: 19-35years), All women were married (off which 64% literate) and Mean parity in group A was 1.97 and 2.06 in group B. Mean pain score during intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) insertion on visual analogue scale was 2.93 in group A and 3 in group B and was not statistically different. 84% women completed 12 months follow up in group A and 83.33% women in group B. Strings were visible in 74% women in group A and in 34% women in group B at 1 month of IUCD insertion. Visibility of strings increased in successive follow up visits and was visible in >80% of women at the end of one year in the both groups. String visibility after intra-Caesarean insertion was delayed. Fifty one percent (n=77) subjects in group A and 54% (n=81) in group B experienced amenorrhea up to six months. Menorrhagia was reported in 7.33% in group A and women 8.66% in group B at the end of 1 year of follow up. Pain was complained by 26 out of 150 (17.3%) women in group A as compared to 36 out of 150 (24%) women in group B after 1 month of insertion. There was no case of PID in group A whereas there were 3 cases of PID in group B. There was no perforation/trauma and pregnancy in either group.Conclusions: Overall expulsion rate was 13% and removal rate was 5% in our study. Continuation rate was 83.3% in Cu 375 and 80.6% in CuT380A at 12 months. There was no significant difference between the IUCDs regarding the safety, efficacy and complications such as expulsion, bleeding etc.

show abstract

Comparison between Cupper T380 IUD and Multiload 375 IUD in early post partum insertion

Cited by 21 publications

References 6 publications

PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380a) insertion: a comparative study in a referral hospital of Karnataka, India

PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380a) insertion: a comparative study in a referral hospital of Karnataka, India

Changing trends in intrauterine contraceptive device: from interval intrauterine contraceptive device to postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: a prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital in eastern Uttar Pradesh

A study to evaluate and compare the expulsion and continuation rates of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT 380A in Indian women at a premier hospital in New Delhi, India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About