The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2010.5596592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between different methods for developing neural network topology applied to a complex polymerization process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, their focus was on the ANN with two hidden layers. 37 Additionally, coupling the ANN-GA techniques has been extensively applied for predicting and finding the optimal parameters in scientific surveys and engineering design. 36 Besides, such method has been employed for optimizing the structural features of the biological scaffolds for meeting the needed mechanical features of native tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, their focus was on the ANN with two hidden layers. 37 Additionally, coupling the ANN-GA techniques has been extensively applied for predicting and finding the optimal parameters in scientific surveys and engineering design. 36 Besides, such method has been employed for optimizing the structural features of the biological scaffolds for meeting the needed mechanical features of native tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simultaneous topological and structural optimization of a neural model for the styrene polymerization was performed using three methods: a six-step optimization methodology based on a systematized trial and error applied for ANN parameters (OMP method), a classic DE variant, and a GA approach (Curteanu et al 2010). A model able to predict monomer conversion, numerical average molecular weight, and gravimetrical average molecular weight was created using initiator concentration, temperature, and reaction time as input variables.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the interaction between factors is also neglected, leading to a low efficiency in process optimization, which is not guaranteed to find the optimal value [ 19 ]. Works by [ 20 , 21 ] have successfully optimized the network setting such as the number of neurons, the epoch and training function using the genetic algorithm (GA), and differential evaluation (DE). There is no specific rule used in selecting the value of network parameters, and this process is dependent on the complexity of the modelled system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is most important to find the network parameters, which will affect the determination of weight and bias for model development. Several pieces of literature focus on the improvement of network training by optimizing the weights and biases using other optimization approaches such as GA and PSO [ 21 , 22 ]. The response surface methodology (RSM) method has successfully adopted in the literature to optimize the data from process industries, mainly for the membrane bioreactor treatment process [ 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%