SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-3311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Direct and Indirect Fuel Injection in an S.I. Two-Stroke Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen from the literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13] that gasoline direct injection (GDI) in two stroke engines promises to reduce the scavenging losses. This associated with better mixture preparation characteristics with GDI…”
Section: Port Injection 4 Direct Injection In Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen from the literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13] that gasoline direct injection (GDI) in two stroke engines promises to reduce the scavenging losses. This associated with better mixture preparation characteristics with GDI…”
Section: Port Injection 4 Direct Injection In Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent implementation of gasoline direct injection (GDI) has greatly improved two-stroke engines by reducing the short-circuiting of unburned fuel, which has led to lower hydrocarbon (HC) emissions, a reduced fuel consumption, 1 and a higher power output. Additionally, the charge cooling effect has increased the knock-limited compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPDI is better for operating in the homogenous charge region with a longer mixing duration as compared to HPDI being predominantly stratified. LPDI also had similar power output and torque when compared to HPDI [70].…”
Section: Injection Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 90%