2008
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e3181622568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Discriminant Analysis Models and “Glaucoma Probability Score” for the Detection of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Head Changes

Abstract: The GPS showed similar sensitivity and specificity to the Mikelberg and Bathija formulas; this method is a promising one for differentiating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes, requiring no subjective user input.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant associations were found between IOP and HRT parameters except for GPS (ONL) confirming partially previous OHTS results (Zangwill et al 2004). The ability of the GPS to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes has been evaluated extensively in the literature (De Leon-Ortega et al 2007;Alencar et al 2008;Ferreras et al 2008;Iester et al 2008). There is a general consensus that it is at least as effective as MRA and has the advantage that it is contour line drawing independent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…No significant associations were found between IOP and HRT parameters except for GPS (ONL) confirming partially previous OHTS results (Zangwill et al 2004). The ability of the GPS to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes has been evaluated extensively in the literature (De Leon-Ortega et al 2007;Alencar et al 2008;Ferreras et al 2008;Iester et al 2008). There is a general consensus that it is at least as effective as MRA and has the advantage that it is contour line drawing independent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The ONH was then divided into 6 sectors: temporal sector [with angular extend from À45 to + 45 degrees (T)], temporal-superior sector [from +45 to + 90 degrees (TS)], temporal-inferior sector [from 270 to 315 degrees (TI)], nasal sector [from + 135 to +225 degrees (N)], nasalsuperior sector [from + 90 to +135 degrees (NS)], and nasal-inferior sector [from 225 to 270 degrees (NI)]. 20 According to Jonas et al's classification [inferior (247.5 to 337.5 degrees), superior (22.5 to 112.5 degrees), and temporal (337.5 to 22.5 degrees)], the optic disc was divided into 4 special quadrants: the temporal sector was between 315 to 45 degrees, superior sector (TS+NS) was 45 to 135 degrees, nasal between 135 and 225 degrees and inferior (TI+NI) between 225 to 315 degrees. In this study, the superior and inferior sectors were not rotated temporally as already described and were used by Iester et al's studies.…”
Section: Heidelberg Retina Tomographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 (HRT3, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany; software version 3.1.2) was a confocal scanning laser for measuring and analyzing ONHs 3-dimensionally. [18][19][20] In the last HRT version (version 3.1.2) there is the "ISN'T rule" to distinguish healthy ONHs from glaucomatous ONHs. The aim of this study was to assess whether the rim shape as measured by HRT3 followed Jonas et al's ISN'T rule or any other specific distribution pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaucoma is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive structural and functional injury of the optic nerve complex (optic nerve and parapapillary region) 1–7. Evaluation of visual field (VF) damage remains the major index of the functional impact of glaucoma, and the assessment of its progression has a direct effect on therapeutic decisions and the quality of life of patients 813.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%