2012 Dallas, Texas, July 29 - August 1, 2012 2012
DOI: 10.13031/2013.41921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Dry and Wet Fermentation of Biomasses as Result of the Monitoring of Full Scale Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of methane in biogas resulted in the ranges 63.3-70.5% and 65.0-70.8% for D1 and D2, respectively (Figure 4), results comparable to those from the AD of swine manure [2] and higher than methane concentrations in biogas from bovine manure [3,10]. The literature on the AD of aquaculture effluents reports variable results in terms of methane concentration in biogas: Lanari and Franci [5], for example, reported 80% of CH 4 from the AD of trout effluents, while other authors presented values between 48.9 and 57.6% CH 4 in biogas from Atlantic salmon effluents [4].…”
Section: Biogas Qualitysupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentration of methane in biogas resulted in the ranges 63.3-70.5% and 65.0-70.8% for D1 and D2, respectively (Figure 4), results comparable to those from the AD of swine manure [2] and higher than methane concentrations in biogas from bovine manure [3,10]. The literature on the AD of aquaculture effluents reports variable results in terms of methane concentration in biogas: Lanari and Franci [5], for example, reported 80% of CH 4 from the AD of trout effluents, while other authors presented values between 48.9 and 57.6% CH 4 in biogas from Atlantic salmon effluents [4].…”
Section: Biogas Qualitysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The concentration of methane in biogas resulted in the ranges 63.3-70.5% and 65.0-70.8% for D1 and D2, respectively (Figure 4), results comparable to those from the AD of swine manure [2] and higher than methane concentrations in biogas from bovine manure [3,10]. The literature on the AD Digester D2 presented, in general, a higher production than D1.…”
Section: Biogas Qualitysupporting
confidence: 51%
“…VS is one of the most important parameters of the substrate, which is used for defining the specific biogas production capacity [21]. Similar biogas yields can be obtained from dry and wet digestion processes with suitable amount of substrate feeding [55].…”
Section: Operational Parameters Of the Biogas Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%