1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(06)80292-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between experimental measurements and numerical calculations of the structure of counterflow, diluted, methane-air, premixed flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20]. The complete formulation of the mathematical model for solving the finite burner separation problem with plug flow boundary conditions [21,22] starts with the elliptic form, in cylindrical coordinates, of the two-dimensional equations describing the conservation of total mass, individual chemical species mass, momentum, and energy for the reactive flow occurring between the fuel and the AP solid. By seeking a similarity solution of the governing equations, we can reduce the problem to the solution of a nonlinear, two-point boundary value problem in the axial direction along the stagnation point streamline.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20]. The complete formulation of the mathematical model for solving the finite burner separation problem with plug flow boundary conditions [21,22] starts with the elliptic form, in cylindrical coordinates, of the two-dimensional equations describing the conservation of total mass, individual chemical species mass, momentum, and energy for the reactive flow occurring between the fuel and the AP solid. By seeking a similarity solution of the governing equations, we can reduce the problem to the solution of a nonlinear, two-point boundary value problem in the axial direction along the stagnation point streamline.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known, that flame stretch -defined as the fractional rate of change of the flame surface area [6] -can decrease heat release rates and even lead to flame extinction of laminar flames [7,8]. Under non-adiabatic conditions, flames are more sensitive to effects of strain [9,10]. Indeed, due to the high flame temperatures, cooling of the combustor walls is required to ensure the mechanical integrity of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrows indicate velocities of planar stagnation flow. At low to moderate strain rates, the reaction zone of the flame (indicated by the right line) is to the right of the stagnation point of the flow products [7][8][9][10][40][41][42][43][44]. In both cases, the strain rate is uniform over the flame surface with no curvature effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical simulation of the counterflow diffusion flame was obtained solving the mass, momentum, energy, and species conservation equations along the stagnation streamline using a model described in Ref. [14], where the pertinent conservation equations and the employed boundary and initial conditions are described in detail. An existing numerical code [14], developed to simulate steady counterflow diffusion flames, was modified by introducing a backward Euler approximation for the evaluation of the time derivatives in the conservation equations.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14], where the pertinent conservation equations and the employed boundary and initial conditions are described in detail. An existing numerical code [14], developed to simulate steady counterflow diffusion flames, was modified by introducing a backward Euler approximation for the evaluation of the time derivatives in the conservation equations. The numerical model used detailed chemical kinetics (GRI version 2.11 [15], 48 species and 275 reactions), and transport properties.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%