2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/11850.5738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between External Rotation Method and Milch Method For Reduction of Acute Anterior Dislocation of Shoulder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success rate in their study was 88.46% by ERM and 69.23% in Milch method. 6 Gluer O et al compared four different methods (Spaso, Chair, Kocher and Masten) for anterior dislocation of shoulder and similar to our study did not conclude any statistical difference among them. 10 Our study corroborates the epidemiology of shoulder joint dislocations as described by previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The success rate in their study was 88.46% by ERM and 69.23% in Milch method. 6 Gluer O et al compared four different methods (Spaso, Chair, Kocher and Masten) for anterior dislocation of shoulder and similar to our study did not conclude any statistical difference among them. 10 Our study corroborates the epidemiology of shoulder joint dislocations as described by previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…5 Milch method is also painless, safe and reliable method in which position of humerus helps to neutralize deforming muscle forces which helps in reduction. 6 The comparison of both methods in terms of efficacy and reliability has been done by only a few studies. The success rate and outcome of both methods were compared in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,14] Similarly, the success rate for the ExR ranged from 78 to 100%. [22,23] Nonetheless, this study has some limitations. First, the patients with habitual GHD were included in the study.…”
Section: Table II the Characteristics Of Patients Among Reduction Groupsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…No se utiliza tracción durante el procedimiento. Una vez que se logra la reducción, el brazo se gira internamente para llevar el antebrazo al pecho (9).…”
Section: Técnica De Rotación Externaunclassified