2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(00)00017-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between finite element formulations of active constrained layer damping using classical and layer-wise laminate theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen, etc [21] established the integral finite elements for elastic-viscoelastic composite beams. Park, etc [22] compared two finite elements of viscoelastic composite plates. Daya and others [23] established a shell finite element for viscoelastically damped sandwich structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen, etc [21] established the integral finite elements for elastic-viscoelastic composite beams. Park, etc [22] compared two finite elements of viscoelastic composite plates. Daya and others [23] established a shell finite element for viscoelastically damped sandwich structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can dramatically reduce the cost, weight and complexity of structural control. Therefore, the research on the dynamic characteristics of ACLD structures has been developed extensively in recent years [1][2][3]. In the exiting references, the analytical method is limited to a few simple structures and boundary conditions, so the finite element method is used widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectively, some layerwise models for constrained or integrated viscoelastic treatments modelling have been published [8][9][10][11], evidencing good accuracy in the simulation of the damping layer effects. Lately, layerwise models have been used in the modelling of the mechanical and electrical fields of active and viscoelastic hybrid damping structures as well [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%