2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(2000)26:3<292::aid-lsm7>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between isotropic and nonisotropic dosimetry systems during intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy

Abstract: Background and Objective: On-line monitoring of light fluence during intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy (IP PDT) is crucial for safe light delivery. A flat photodiode-based dosimetry system is compared with an isotropic detector-based system in patients undergoing IP PDT. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Flat photodiodes and spherical detectors were placed side by side in the abdomen, for simultaneous light dosimetry in 19 patients. Tissue phantom experiments were performed to provide a preliminary estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 This might be responsible for the unpredictable response and variability between clinical dosimetry and PDT outcome. 13,14 To find a better solution for PDT dosimetry, explicit PDT dosimetry has been introduced. Unlike using the given photosensitizer dosage and light fluence as PDT metrics, in explicit PDT dosimetry, the light dose absorbed by the photosensitizer in tissue is measured and defined as PDT dose, which is determined by the product of photosensitizer concentration and light fluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 This might be responsible for the unpredictable response and variability between clinical dosimetry and PDT outcome. 13,14 To find a better solution for PDT dosimetry, explicit PDT dosimetry has been introduced. Unlike using the given photosensitizer dosage and light fluence as PDT metrics, in explicit PDT dosimetry, the light dose absorbed by the photosensitizer in tissue is measured and defined as PDT dose, which is determined by the product of photosensitizer concentration and light fluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light delivery and dosimetry system were similar to the technique previously described (6). Light doses were monitored with fixed peritoneal diodes located in the right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, left peritoneal gutter, right peritoneal gutter, and in the midline pelvis anteriorly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The effect on the measured fluence rate is significant. 34 Because these probes collect light via multiple scattering, the interface between the scattering tip and the surrounding medium can change the sensitivity of the detector by as much as a factor of 2, requiring careful calibration. 35 Because complete explicit dosimetry requires measurement of three different parameters, it is inherently challenging.…”
Section: Iib2 Pdt Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our current clinical trials, we deliver a dose of light to the treatment sites based upon measurements made from implanted isotropic light detectors. 34,76 These detectors allow us to prescribe the light dose based upon actual measurements in the prostate rather than the output of the laser. This dosimetric approach also ensures that the same amount of light energy ͑as measured by the isotropic detectors͒ is deposited uniformly in the prostate within each cohort of patients as a specific dose level.…”
Section: Iiia Light Dosimetry With Real-time Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%