2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches for prediction of particle deposition in turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forces acting on each individual particle are considered and the particle momentum and positions are calculated for every step of the solution. Both approaches have some advantages depending on the application [19,20]. With the Lagrangian approach, detailed information for each individual particle injected into the solution domain: particle positions and trajectories, particle momentum, and particle fates (trapped on the surfaces, escaped the solution domain, or stagnated), are available.…”
Section: Particulate Flow and Particle Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forces acting on each individual particle are considered and the particle momentum and positions are calculated for every step of the solution. Both approaches have some advantages depending on the application [19,20]. With the Lagrangian approach, detailed information for each individual particle injected into the solution domain: particle positions and trajectories, particle momentum, and particle fates (trapped on the surfaces, escaped the solution domain, or stagnated), are available.…”
Section: Particulate Flow and Particle Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, there are no collisions between particles because they are simulated as points. In [19], the researchers show that the results obtained using the Lagrangian approach are worse compared to the Eulerian approach, and the simulation time is longer for the latter. This method can be applied in flows with a volume concentration of up to 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods have gradually become a powerful tool for studying particle settlement and particle-wall interactions. [23][24][25] Arsalanloo and Abbasalizadeh 26 used the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) and the Lagrangian method to study the deposition and infiltration of particles in a 90°bend with a small diameter of 8.51 mm in the presence of swirling flow. The results show that both decreasing the swirl pitch and increasing the blade height increase the swirl intensity at higher Stokes numbers, while higher swirl intensity could reduce the particle deposition rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%