2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Lagrangian and mesoscopic Eulerian modelling approaches for inertial particles suspended in decaying isotropic turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical tests [22] show that projection errors are due to the finite particle per cell number (statistical bias) and spatial discretisation. To limit these effects, the truncated Gaussian projector kernel is used:…”
Section: Measurement Of Particle Eulerian Quantities From Dns+dps Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical tests [22] show that projection errors are due to the finite particle per cell number (statistical bias) and spatial discretisation. To limit these effects, the truncated Gaussian projector kernel is used:…”
Section: Measurement Of Particle Eulerian Quantities From Dns+dps Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moments of the PDF are mesoscopic Eulerian quantities which obey transport equations obtained by integration of the Boltzmann-type equation. Recently, Kaufmann et al [22] have computed an Eulerian simulation with the particle number density, correlated velocity and random uncorrelated energy (RUE) coupled with standard Navier-Stokes equations for the fluid and compared particle Eulerian quantities with DNS+DPS results in decaying HIT. They obtained a very good agreement between the mesoscopic Eulerian and Lagrangian predictions for very small particle Stokes number and found a negligible RUE effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaufmann et al [37] successfully used a=6 in their study. Simulation results have proved that any changes in a influences mostly particles concentration field and it has small impacts on pressure drops and heat transfer coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To close these two terms, a transport equation for filtered particle RUE can be solved, as proposed by Février et al [32]. This has been done by Kaufmann et al [70] when simulating DNS of particle-laden HIT flows, showing good agreement between Lagrangian and Eulerian results. Still, these models proposed for the unclosed terms due to RUM are very recent and the validity of the viscosity model has recently been questioned by Riber [33] when performing LES in a particle-laden turbulent confined jet flow [71].…”
Section: Simplified Euler/euler Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%