2011
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between nasopharyngeal swab and nasal wash, using culture and PCR, in the detection of potential respiratory pathogens

Abstract: BackgroundNasopharyngeal carriage of potential pathogens is important as it is both the major source of transmission and the prerequisite of invasive disease. New methods for detecting carriage could improve comfort, accuracy and laboratory utility. The aims of this study were to compare the sensitivities of a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and a nasal wash (NW) in detecting potential respiratory pathogens in healthy adults using microbiological culture and PCR.ResultsHealthy volunteers attended for nasal washing a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NW samples were processed as previously described (20). Volunteers in whom 6B pneumococci were detected by classical microbiology from NW samples collected on any of the visits were defined as carriers.…”
Section: Nasal Washing and Determination Of Carriagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NW samples were processed as previously described (20). Volunteers in whom 6B pneumococci were detected by classical microbiology from NW samples collected on any of the visits were defined as carriers.…”
Section: Nasal Washing and Determination Of Carriagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No difference in the geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) was observed when prechallenge (baseline) samples of carriage-positive volunteers and carriagenegative volunteers were compared (P ¼ 0. 20 …”
Section: Carriage Increases Opsonophagocytic Activity Of Antibodies Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Jeoung et al (2013) used both NS and whole blood samples for CIRDC virus detection, but found that only CDV (and not CIV and CRCoV) could be detected from the whole blood samples [10]. Correspondingly, respiratory swabs have been reported to be appropriate samples for the detection of respiratory pathogens [9, 16]. Thus, NS and OS served as appropriate sample sources in our study due to their ease of and non-invasive sampling nature and that they lie on the viral shedding routes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method of carriage assessment is a nasal wash, chosen because a recent study 10 showed that 91% of volunteers found nasal wash to be more comfortable than nasopharyngeal swab; the nasal wash was also more likely to detect pathogens using microbiological culture. Microbial flora recovered on blood agar plates inoculated with NW can be variable and difficult to read.…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%