Comparison between Obando´s anthropometric formula and Mondelli´s formula to estimate central incisor width.

Abstract

Objective: to compare Mondelli's formula with Obando's anthropometric formula in order to determine the mesiodistal width of maxillary central incisor. Materials and Methods: 100 adults (50 women) were selected. The mesiodistal width of maxillary central incisor was measured. Maximum smile was used for Mondelli's formula. Inter-alar distance and longitudinal axis of the ear were used for Obando's formula. Correlations and differences between estimates of both formulas and the actual mesiodistal width of the central incisor were estimated. Results: Obando's formula presented a strong correlation (r=0.8846) with the mesiodistal width, with no statistically significant differences between the two measures (p>0.05). Mondelli's formula presented a moderate negative correlation with the mesiodistal width (r=-0.3401) and a statistically significant difference with respect to the mesiodistal width (p<0.0001), in both men and women. Conclusion: Obando's formula estimated more accurately the mesiodistal width of the central incisor in comparison to Mondelli's formula in the Peruvian population.

Correlation between interalar distance and mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth in Thrissur, Kerala, Indian population

“…Review of literature shows that various anatomical measurements have been proposed to aid in the successful selection of maxillary anterior teeth such as bizygomatic width,[ 2 ] interpupillary distances,[ 3 ] intercommissural width,[ 1 ] head diameter,[ 4 ] innercanthal distance,[ 5 ] and interalar distance. [ 1 ]…”