2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Pixelated Scintillators: CsI(Tl), LaCl 3(Ce) and LYSO(Ce) when coupled to a Silicon Photomultipliers Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 for a 10 × 10 × 10 mm 2 crystal and by Jeong, M. et al . 14 for 50.8 × 50.8 × 10 mm 2 crystals are in good agreement with our predictions, the latter in spite of using a pixelated crystal array and a different photodetector.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 12 for a 10 × 10 × 10 mm 2 crystal and by Jeong, M. et al . 14 for 50.8 × 50.8 × 10 mm 2 crystals are in good agreement with our predictions, the latter in spite of using a pixelated crystal array and a different photodetector.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More recently, Jeong, M. et al . 14 published the energy spectrum from two pixelated LYSO crystal sizes (50.8 × 50.8 × 5 mm 3 and 50.8 × 50.8 × 10 mm 3 ), but did not dwell upon the clearly visible differences in the relative intensities of the broad peaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the background radiation as a "field-flood" source for detector calibration and attenuation correction requires a complete characterization and understanding of the 176 Lu intrinsic energy spectrum in singles and coincidence mode. In singles mode, this intrinsic energy spectrum has been previously reported [17][18][19][20][21]. In 2010, Goertzen et al [22] developed a method for estimating the energy spectrum of coincidence events in a PET system and compared it with measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission) [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note, however, that the maximum end-point energy at 1190 keV (the Q-value of the decay 176 Lu to 176 Hf) remains unchained and is an important landmark. The peak shifting as a result of filtering (finite energy resolution) is important, can be observed in background energy spectra published by other research groups, 14,24,57,58 has led to detector miscalibration in the past, and needs to be taken into account if a correct detector energy assessment is to be attained using the intrinsic background radiation.…”
Section: D Filtering Of Energy Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%