2020
DOI: 10.1127/metz/2020/1039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between precipitation estimates of ground-based weather radar composites and GPM's DPR rainfall product over Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using GPM DPR products, the uncertainty in precipitation estimation and microphysical retrieval of heavy rainfalls is reported in Pejcic et al (2020) and Huang et al (2021), which might be affected by the measurement errors of Z e in Ka-band and Z e in Ku-band as well as the assumptions of DSD model, mixing model and melting process (Seto and Iguchi, 2011;Seto et al, 2013). In theory, the attenuation difference in Kaband and Ku-band increases monotonically with range and the increasing rate suddenly changes at the height where the phase state changes (such as the melting layer).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When using GPM DPR products, the uncertainty in precipitation estimation and microphysical retrieval of heavy rainfalls is reported in Pejcic et al (2020) and Huang et al (2021), which might be affected by the measurement errors of Z e in Ka-band and Z e in Ku-band as well as the assumptions of DSD model, mixing model and melting process (Seto and Iguchi, 2011;Seto et al, 2013). In theory, the attenuation difference in Kaband and Ku-band increases monotonically with range and the increasing rate suddenly changes at the height where the phase state changes (such as the melting layer).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DPR operates at Ku band (KuPR,13.6 GHz) and Ka band (KaPR,35.5 GHz), which can provide information on drop size distributions (DSDs) in rain and snow as well as estimations of rainfall and snowfall rates (Beauchamp et al, 2015;Hamada and Takayabu, 2016;Jackson et al, 2016). These GPM parameters are evaluated and widely adopted to study deep convective precipitation and its vertical structure (Chen et al, 2020b;Huang and Chen, 2019;Libertino et al, 2016;Liu and Liu, 2016;Pejcic et al, 2020;Zhang and Fu, 2018a;. Compared to the observation of a global rain gauge network, Libertino et al (2016) found that GPM might improve the ability of detecting extreme rainfall than TRMM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Afterward, the obtained rain rates are mapped from the original polar grid onto the above-mentioned 1 km polar stereo-graphic grid. A more detailed description of the composite steps and the performance of the RY product is given by [49].…”
Section: A Data Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the launch of the Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) on 28 Febuary 2014, an extended and high quality set of spaceborne radar precipitation measurements have become available [47][48][49]. The Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) at Ku-band (13.6 GHz) and Ka-band (35.5 GHz) [50] on-board the NASA/JAXA GPM Core Observatory (GPM-CO) provides precipitation measurements, covering the globe from 67 • N to 67 • S. The high quality of DPR-based products is supported by several validation studies [51][52][53][54] and field campaigns [55,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%