1969
DOI: 10.1029/wr005i003p00724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Rain Gage and Lysimeter Measurements

Abstract: Rain gage data were compared with ground level precipitation as determined with a highly sensitive weighing lysimeter 20 feet in diameter. Rain gages of various types were tested in the Central Valley of California during twenty‐four storms in the 1966–1968 rainfall seasons. Rainfall totals for each storm as measured by the lysimeter and by several rain gages in its vicinity were compared by regression analysis. Wind effects on a standing gage seemed unimportant, since agreement was close between a standard 8‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…,rguez-lturbe and Mej;a, 1974] (diagonal error covariance matrix is used).The measurement error variance and data collection costs associated with each discrete point are given inTable 1. The error variances were assigned so as to resemble variances obtained from data given byMorgan and Lourence [1969] for errors observed in readings of Fisher and Porter, Standard 8in., and USSR-GGI3000 rain gages, in comparison to lysimeter measurements. In doing these calculations to obtain the desired ball park figures it was assumed that the lysimeter readings represented the true mean value, that rainfall processes were stationary, and that rain gages behave similarly for different storms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,rguez-lturbe and Mej;a, 1974] (diagonal error covariance matrix is used).The measurement error variance and data collection costs associated with each discrete point are given inTable 1. The error variances were assigned so as to resemble variances obtained from data given byMorgan and Lourence [1969] for errors observed in readings of Fisher and Porter, Standard 8in., and USSR-GGI3000 rain gages, in comparison to lysimeter measurements. In doing these calculations to obtain the desired ball park figures it was assumed that the lysimeter readings represented the true mean value, that rainfall processes were stationary, and that rain gages behave similarly for different storms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morgan & Lourence [158] reported broad agreement between a grassed lysimeter 20 feet (~6.6 m) in diameter located in the Central Valley of California and several types of recording rain gauges located nearby. The resolution in rainfall depth was reported as 1/1000th inch (0.025 mm).…”
Section: Weighing Lysimetersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The mean storm used to characterize the family of interest is shown in Figure 4 The measurement error variances given were set to be compatible with results on rain gage accuracy published by Morgan and Lourence [1969]. A wide range of values was purposely used to create a more heterogeneous system.…”
Section: The Second Step Consists Of Another Computer Program This Pmentioning
confidence: 99%