2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000059433.79220.2b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between replacement at 4 days and 7 days of the infection rate for pulmonary artery catheters in an intensive care unit*

Abstract: No statistically significant difference was found for pulmonary artery catheter-associated infection when intervals of 4 or 7 days between insertion and replacement were compared. Patients with prolonged pulmonary artery catheterization must be carefully examined for signs or symptoms of infection. The time until pulmonary artery catheter replacement can be extended to 7 days if there is no evidence of catheter-related infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts must be made to differentiate between infection related to the introducer and that related to the pulmonary artery catheter. Significant colonization of the introducer occurs earlier than that of the pulmonary artery catheter [337,339]. However, no studies indicate that catheter replacement at scheduled time intervals is an effective method to reduce risk of CRBSI [165,327,339].…”
Section: Replacement Of Cvcs Including Piccs and Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts must be made to differentiate between infection related to the introducer and that related to the pulmonary artery catheter. Significant colonization of the introducer occurs earlier than that of the pulmonary artery catheter [337,339]. However, no studies indicate that catheter replacement at scheduled time intervals is an effective method to reduce risk of CRBSI [165,327,339].…”
Section: Replacement Of Cvcs Including Piccs and Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts must be made to differentiate between infection related to the introducer and that related to the pulmonary artery catheter. Significant colonization of the introducer occurs earlier than that of the pulmonary artery catheter [337,339]. However, no studies indicate that catheter replacement at scheduled time intervals is an effective method to reduce risk of CRBSI [165,327,339].…”
Section: Replacement Of Cvcs Including Piccs and Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant colonization of the introducer occurs earlier than that of the pulmonary artery catheter [337,339]. However, no studies indicate that catheter replacement at scheduled time intervals is an effective method to reduce risk of CRBSI [165,327,339]. In patients who continue to require hemodynamic monitoring, pulmonary artery catheters do not need to be changed more frequently than every 7 days [339].…”
Section: Replacement Of Cvcs Including Piccs and Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires considerable skill and puts the patient at risk of potentially life-threatening side effects, including hemorrhage, 27 thrombosis, 28 and infection. 29 There is, therefore, a significant risk of morbidity and mortality from the use of the PAC itself.…”
Section: Figure 1 Agreement Between Impedance and Thermodilution Carmentioning
confidence: 99%