2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-020-00937-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between resorbable plates vs. titanium plates for treatment of zygomatic fractures: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In orthognathic surgery, PLA-based bioabsorbable fixation materials have no difference from titanium in terms of infection as a complication [20][21][22][23][24]. Contrary to our clinical experience in oral maxillofacial fracture surgery, no major difference between the two materials was pointed out [25][26][27]. However, the removal of titanium plates was found to be more frequent than the removal of PLA plates afterward [19,25,26].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In orthognathic surgery, PLA-based bioabsorbable fixation materials have no difference from titanium in terms of infection as a complication [20][21][22][23][24]. Contrary to our clinical experience in oral maxillofacial fracture surgery, no major difference between the two materials was pointed out [25][26][27]. However, the removal of titanium plates was found to be more frequent than the removal of PLA plates afterward [19,25,26].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…A current metaanalysis showed that absorbable plates showed better postoperative clinical performance. 26 To a certain extent, this increases the difficulty and time of operation for the surgeon, and also increases the cost of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, complications may arise from permanent implants requiring second surgery for the removal of implants due to infection, loosening (stress shielding [ 13 ]), implant failure [ 2 ], increases in the serum metal levels (soft tissue and blood cells) in the surrounding connective tissues [ 14 ], and local destruction of soft or hard tissues around the implant [ 15 ]. The removal of Ti implants is debatable, however, in certain cases the release of Ti particles causes fibrous encapsulation and chronic inflammation that requires implant removal in up to 40% of the cases [ 16 , 17 ]. These removals require complex surgeries, which also incur additional expense [ 2 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resorbable polymer-based implants are considered as an alternative to Ti implants [ 17 , 18 ]. A comparative study of biodegradable polymers and Ti implants has shown good biological responses for zygomatic implants with the similar occurrence of paresthesia, infection and less dehiscence [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation