2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between rubber–ice and sand–ice friction and the effect of loose snow contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although compact snow and ice can give relatively high friction at temperature well below 0°C, it can become more slippery when loose snow crystals are present (Gnörich and Grosch, 1974;Klein-Paste and Sinha, 2010a). Therefore, profile 3 is similar to profile 2, except that it does not upgrade the prediction at lower temperatures.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although compact snow and ice can give relatively high friction at temperature well below 0°C, it can become more slippery when loose snow crystals are present (Gnörich and Grosch, 1974;Klein-Paste and Sinha, 2010a). Therefore, profile 3 is similar to profile 2, except that it does not upgrade the prediction at lower temperatures.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The frictional behavior of ice has been studied in many contexts, such as in relation to cold-environment sports involving friction on sled runners 1 , skate blades 2 and curling rocks 3 , in the automotive industry concerning rubber tire performance on ice 4 , in shipping regarding friction on hulls of icebreaking ships 5 and other vessels in cold regions, in construction regarding the friction of moving ice on concrete 6 such as piers, bridges and other fixed river and marine structures, in the movement of glaciers 7 regarding ice-on-rock and ice-on-ice friction, and even in relation to extraterrestrial iceon-ice friction in tectonically active regions of the icy Saturnian moon Enceladus 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coecients of static friction encountered in typical walking scenarios can vary widely. For instance, rubber on dry asphalt has a µ s above 0.5 and rubber on ice can drop µ s as low as 0.02 when temperature is near 0 [36] or when only a thin layer of snow is present on the contact area [37]. Depending on the application, providing such a low µ s may be the goal, for instance when studying slipinduced falls.…”
Section: Variable-friction Walking Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%