2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between secondary thermal cracking methods and venturi scrubber filtering in order to reduce tar in biomass gasification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, Table shows the performances of most of the above-discussed tar handling methods reported, which are operated on an industrial scale. , By observing Table , it is understood that OLGA manages to achieve removal efficiencies of 80–92% even when employed as hot gas cleaning (673 K), since oil-based scrubbers can be effective without cooling. Other than OLGA, which is used at high temperatures, only the venturi scrubbers and bed filters, which are used at low temperatures, show removal efficiencies >90%.…”
Section: Tar Destruction/removal: Existing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, Table shows the performances of most of the above-discussed tar handling methods reported, which are operated on an industrial scale. , By observing Table , it is understood that OLGA manages to achieve removal efficiencies of 80–92% even when employed as hot gas cleaning (673 K), since oil-based scrubbers can be effective without cooling. Other than OLGA, which is used at high temperatures, only the venturi scrubbers and bed filters, which are used at low temperatures, show removal efficiencies >90%.…”
Section: Tar Destruction/removal: Existing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the increase in temperature can shift the equilibrium of the reactions, favoring the direction of CH 4 towards additional reactions that convert it into thermal cracking products, such as H 2 . These opposite trends in the concentrations of H 2 and CH 4 reveal the complexity of the reactions involved in the gasification process and the importance of temperature as a decisive variable that influences reaction rates and equilibria [41,42].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature On Gasification Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Char and tar usually occur because of secondary polymerization reactions during SCWG. However, at high reaction temperatures (≥500 °C), gasification and reforming of tar and char have been reported, which lowers their formation [56]. The formation of tar and char is not typically observed from SCWG of liquid feedstocks such as It should be noted that a fraction of H 2 in the gas phase can be contributed through water splitting during the SCWG process [50].…”
Section: Validity Of Model Equation With Simulated Crude Glycerol And...mentioning
confidence: 99%