Comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional laparoscopic instruments vs. four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis: a prospective randomised study

Abstract

Background: The desire to reduce invasiveness, pain, discomfort and improve cosmesis and early return of patient to normal activities is the basis for single incision laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim was to compare post-operative pain and the secondary aim to compare duration of surgery, intraoperative bile spill or stone spill, duration of hospital stay, any postoperative complications and cosmetic outcome between SILC and the gold standard for symptomatic gall stone disease, FPLC (Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Methods: A total of 150 patients were randomized into two groups, A (SILC) and B (FPLC). Post-operative pain and other intra-operative and post -operative parameters were compared. Results: The age ranged between 20 years to 76 years most of them being females with body mass index ranging between 19 and 35 kg/m2. Comparison of pain score was done using MEWS scale; which was found to be statistically significantly SILC at 6 hours, mean difference (MD)-0.833 while at 24 hours the difference was not significant (MD- 0.234). Duration of surgery was significantly more (MD-12.17 minutes) in SILC. No addition of port or conversion to open cholecystectomy was required. There were no significant difference between post-operative complications between the two groups. Cosmesis was significantly better in terms of look of the scar (MD-0.867) and recommending it to their relatives (MD-0.700) in SILC group. Conclusions: SILC is a safe and easily learnable procedure which can be safely be done using conventional laparoscopic instruments in low risk patients. Duration of surgery even after expertise is gained remains to be more than FPLC.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

“…The success of SILC is intricately tied to patient selection criteria. Gupta et al discuss the comparison of cosmetic outcomes between SILC and conventional LC, emphasizing the need to consider demographic and clinical factors when opting for SILC [23]. Factors such as body mass index, the presence of comorbidities, and the complexity of gallbladder disease play a pivotal role in determining the suitability of patients for SILC.…”

“…Moreover, refining patient selection criteria is an area ripe for exploration. Gupta et al emphasized the importance of considering demographic and clinical factors when opting for SILC, indicating that personalized approaches may enhance the success rates of the surgery [23]. Future research should delve deeper into developing robust criteria that allow for optimal patient selection, thereby maximizing the benefits of SILC.…”