2007
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9237-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between solid and hollow reinforced concrete beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A hollow beam has a longitudinal void along its span caused by the removal of concrete using lightweight void formers such as Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipes (Joy and Rajeev, 2014;Varghese and Joy, 2016;Ragavi, 2017;Dhinesh and Satheesh, 2017;Al-Gasham, 2015;Ngu, 2017;Parthiban and Neelamegam, 2017), Polystyrene foams (Manikandan et al, 2015), Polypropylene plastic sheets (Kumbhar and Jadhav, 2018) and plastic bottles (Mathew and Varghese, 2016;Sariman and Nurdin, 2018). These beams have been reported to generally offer a lower strength compared to the solid ones (Kumbhar and Jadhav, 2018;Al-Gasham, 2015;Alshimmeri and Al-Maliki, 2014;Alnuaimi et al, 2008;Inoue and Egawa, 1996). This was associated with the changes caused by the void in its cross-sectional configuration which reduces its second moment of inertia and affects its strength (Ngu, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hollow beam has a longitudinal void along its span caused by the removal of concrete using lightweight void formers such as Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipes (Joy and Rajeev, 2014;Varghese and Joy, 2016;Ragavi, 2017;Dhinesh and Satheesh, 2017;Al-Gasham, 2015;Ngu, 2017;Parthiban and Neelamegam, 2017), Polystyrene foams (Manikandan et al, 2015), Polypropylene plastic sheets (Kumbhar and Jadhav, 2018) and plastic bottles (Mathew and Varghese, 2016;Sariman and Nurdin, 2018). These beams have been reported to generally offer a lower strength compared to the solid ones (Kumbhar and Jadhav, 2018;Al-Gasham, 2015;Alshimmeri and Al-Maliki, 2014;Alnuaimi et al, 2008;Inoue and Egawa, 1996). This was associated with the changes caused by the void in its cross-sectional configuration which reduces its second moment of inertia and affects its strength (Ngu, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concrete optimization process consisted of designing a cavity in the cross-section. The overall structural behaviour was checked, as well as cracking in the compression zone, which is a determining failure mechanism in hollow cross-sections [9]. Both circular and rectangular shapes were considered for the cavity.…”
Section: Concrete Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other approaches are also possible. For instance, designing a cavity in the cross-section of a beam can significantly reduce the amount of concrete required to construct it, although certain structural considerations must then be taken into account [9]. Furthermore, a concrete structure with replaceable components might facilitate building repair and reuse of its components, thereby extending its life span and minimizing its environmental impact [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, for aesthetic, economic, and functional purposes including leaving spaces for mechanical and electrical supply lines, computer networks, water and sewage pipelines, and reducing member weight to save materials, the openings in RC beams and slabs have become popular in the construction of buildings, bridges, offshore structures, and towers [9][10][11][12]. Many studies have considered various configurations of web openings in RC beams [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have considered various configurations of web openings in RC beams [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, other studies have investigated structural behaviours of RC beams with longitudinal openings [8][9][10][11][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and these studies are related to the current study and can be divided into two big groups, i.e., experimental and numerical studies in a chronological order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%