2017
DOI: 10.17519/apiculture.2017.04.32.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Specific DNA-amplifications using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) and using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because of the method itself, it still has some defects. Such as RPA reactions produce more non-specific amplifications relative to PCR, a difficult phenomenon to avoid [28,51]. Therefore, it is necessary to screen primers in order to minimize the interference of non-specific amplification for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the method itself, it still has some defects. Such as RPA reactions produce more non-specific amplifications relative to PCR, a difficult phenomenon to avoid [28,51]. Therefore, it is necessary to screen primers in order to minimize the interference of non-specific amplification for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, RPA reactions produce more non-specific amplifications relative to PCR, a difficult phenomenon to avoid (Kim et al, 2017). Therefore, it is necessary to screen primers to minimize the interference of non-specific amplification for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%