2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between surgery and radiofrequency ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KIM et al [26] compared RFA (n=8) with lobectomy and pneumonectomy (n=14) after a matching process based on age, sex, tumour-nodemetastasis stage and time to treatment. They obtained a 5-year survival rate of 25% for RFA and 67% for surgery, with no statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KIM et al [26] compared RFA (n=8) with lobectomy and pneumonectomy (n=14) after a matching process based on age, sex, tumour-nodemetastasis stage and time to treatment. They obtained a 5-year survival rate of 25% for RFA and 67% for surgery, with no statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image-guided thermal ablation is becoming increasingly accepted for the treatment of certain benign and malignant tumors of the lungs, liver, kidneys, bone, and soft tissues (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Numerous thermal and nonthermal ablation modalities are available, including radiofrequency (RF) ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasonography (US), laser ablation, irreversible electroporation, chemical ablation (with ethanol and acetic acid), and brachytherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported local recurrence was higher for RFA, and OSs were similar for RFA (n=8) and surgery (n=14) in stage I NSCLC (18). In another study, though RFA-treated stage I and II NSCLC patients were significantly older than those treated surgically, no significant difference in OS was observed (15).…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 84%