2020
DOI: 10.5302/j.icros.2020.20.0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Traditional and CNN Based Stereo Matching Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, we evaluate an algorithm using two criteria: matching Success Rate and algorithm runtime. We first define the matching accuracy, which is defined in (14).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our experiments, we evaluate an algorithm using two criteria: matching Success Rate and algorithm runtime. We first define the matching accuracy, which is defined in (14).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, most multisource image template matching algorithms achieve template matching by extracting structural features from the grayscale image and then evaluating the similarity between dense structural features [13], [14], [15], [16]. Recently, Lu et al [13] proposed a template matching algorithm based on Structure Tensor Voting and Orientation (STVO), which is a dense feature descriptor algorithm but has a much higher computing efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there are differences in brightness according to the lighting of the two places where the camera is installed, or differences in brightness in an image according to the exposure of the aperture. In addition, various conditions cause problems that are difficult to correct [6]. To address these problems, many studies [7,8] have been conducted.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%