2006
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.44.3.720-724.2006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Two Amplification Sets for Molecular Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis by Real-Time PCR

Abstract: PCR is now commonly applied to the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Although several methods are available, comparative studies are few, making it difficult to compare the performance of each technique. We compared the sensitivities of two real-time PCR assays through a prospective study on fetuses, neonates, and immunocompromised patients and on the ocular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. The first system targeted the widely used B1 gene (GenBank accession number AF179871) while the second (RE) targeted a more recently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
61
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously described in other studies, this can be explained by the difference in the number of repetitions of this sequence (about 7-to 10-fold more repeated than B1) (11), which results in a gain of about 4 C T (12,14), as observed here (P Ͻ 0.001), and allows for the detection of 10-fold lower parasite loads (14). However, few studies evaluated the impact in terms of the sensitivity of diagnosis in routine clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As previously described in other studies, this can be explained by the difference in the number of repetitions of this sequence (about 7-to 10-fold more repeated than B1) (11), which results in a gain of about 4 C T (12,14), as observed here (P Ͻ 0.001), and allows for the detection of 10-fold lower parasite loads (14). However, few studies evaluated the impact in terms of the sensitivity of diagnosis in routine clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…DNA sequence was chosen [27] and the formalin-fixation was restricted to 24 h. However, the fixation procedure might have accounted for a lower rate of positive PCR results due to DNA fragmentation, leading to an underestimation of the real infection frequency.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity was higher with a real-time PCR assay targeting the T. gondii repeat element of 529 base pairs [68] than with real-time PCR targeting the B1 gene (40% and 36% respectively). Real-time PCR has been shown to be more sensitive on a variety of samples when the 529-bp repeat element rather than the B1 gene was used as a target [71]. In contrast to the IB and GWC results, the results of PCR are not influenced by the interval between symptom onset and paracentesis.…”
Section: Diagnosis Is Based On Clinical Signs and Some Selected Biolomentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We showed [68] that a combination of all three methods had a 85% sensitivity and a 93% specificity for the diagnosis of atypical or extensive toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. The sensitivity of GWC alone for atypical uveitis (based mainly on aqueous humor samples) ranges from 39% to 93% [60,63,65,67,[69][70][71]. Discrepancies could be explained by differences in (i) the interval between symptom onset and paracentesis, (ii) the characteristics of the uveitis (typical or atypical), (iii) underlying immunological status, and (iv), the chosen GWC positivity threshold, which ranges from 2 to 8 in the literature.…”
Section: Diagnosis Is Based On Clinical Signs and Some Selected Biolomentioning
confidence: 99%