1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(98)80040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between two fat emulsions: Intralipid® 30%vs Intralipid® 10% in critically ill patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, 20% SOFE is preferred over 10% SOFE as an IVFE source in low‐birth‐weight infants. Similar differences were seen in a study comparing different concentrations of SOFE in critically ill adults 59 . Patients who received a 30% emulsion had lower plasma levels of triglycerides, phospholipids, and free cholesterol than those who received the 10% SOFE.…”
Section: Oil Sources: Impact On Clearancesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For this reason, 20% SOFE is preferred over 10% SOFE as an IVFE source in low‐birth‐weight infants. Similar differences were seen in a study comparing different concentrations of SOFE in critically ill adults 59 . Patients who received a 30% emulsion had lower plasma levels of triglycerides, phospholipids, and free cholesterol than those who received the 10% SOFE.…”
Section: Oil Sources: Impact On Clearancesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, we demonstrated the relationship between stress and blood lipid metabolism using Intralipid ® as a tracer for the simple fat emulsion clearance test in mice exposed to restraint stress. Intralipid ® , an artificial lipid emulsion used to supply energy and essential fatty acids, is commonly used in clinical practice (17) and also as a tracer for blood triglyceride (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors suggest that this may be due to the lower phospholipid/triglyceride ratio in the former emulsion, with both lipid emulsions showing similar results with respect to tolerance and safety (Garcia de Lorenzo et al, 2003). Kalfarentzos et al (1998) observed similar results.…”
Section: Implementation Of Nutrition Care Planmentioning
confidence: 94%