2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison for younger and older adults: Stimulus temporal asynchrony modulates audiovisual integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the AV discrimination task, the visual non-target stimulus was a black and white checkerboard image (B/W checkerboard, 52 × 52 mm, with a visual angle of 5 • ), and the visual target stimulus was a B/W checkerboard image with two black dots contained within each white checkerboard (He et al, 1996;Talsma and Woldorff, 2005;Ren et al, 2016). The auditory nontarget stimulus was a 1000 Hz sinusoidal tone, and the auditory target stimulus was white noise (Yang et al, 2015;Ren et al, 2016Ren et al, , 2018b. The AV target stimulus was the combination of visual target and auditory target stimuli, and the AV non-target stimulus was the combination of visual non-target and auditory non-target stimuli.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the AV discrimination task, the visual non-target stimulus was a black and white checkerboard image (B/W checkerboard, 52 × 52 mm, with a visual angle of 5 • ), and the visual target stimulus was a B/W checkerboard image with two black dots contained within each white checkerboard (He et al, 1996;Talsma and Woldorff, 2005;Ren et al, 2016). The auditory nontarget stimulus was a 1000 Hz sinusoidal tone, and the auditory target stimulus was white noise (Yang et al, 2015;Ren et al, 2016Ren et al, , 2018b. The AV target stimulus was the combination of visual target and auditory target stimuli, and the AV non-target stimulus was the combination of visual non-target and auditory non-target stimuli.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies and topographic response patterns, five regions of interest (ROIs) (frontal: F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8; fronto-central: FC5, FC1, FC2, FC6; central: C3, Cz, C4; centroparietal: CP5, CP1, CP2, CP6; and occipital: O1, Oz, O2) in the 0-600 ms time interval were selected (Yang et al, 2015;Ren et al, 2018b). One-way ANOVA showed no significant lateralization effect for any of these ROIs; therefore, we chose one representative electrode with the highest activity in each ROI (Fz, FC1, Cz, CP1, and Oz) for further analysis.…”
Section: Theta/alpha Activity and Audio-visual Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example from among life experiences is that we generally see lightning and then hear the thunderclap, although the lightning and thunderclap occur simultaneously. This phenomenon indicates that the integration of multiple forms of sensory information obeys the temporal principle ( Stein, 2012 ; Ren et al, 2017a ). When auditory and visual signals occur at the same time and location, they tend to be integrated, and temporal proximity is always a necessary factor for the occurrence of audiovisual integration ( Van der Burg et al, 2008 ; Ren et al, 2017b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audiovisual integration is involved in multiple brain regions, including the occipital, parietal, temporal, and frontal regions ( Shams et al, 2005 ). Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and EEG studies have yielded evidence of audiovisual integration effect occurrence in regions traditionally considered sensory specific (e.g., primary visual cortex) ( Calvert et al, 2000 ; Macaluso, 2006 ; Chan et al, 2017 ; Ren et al, 2017a ). Moreover, direct anatomical connections between the occipital regions (visual processing) and superior temporal regions (auditory processing) have confirmed that these regions may play key roles in audiovisual integration ( Falchier et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, although there is no evidence of pathology in the visual cortex of PD patients, the present studies have implied the dysfunction of visual perception, and reduced activity in visual association cortices and primary visual cortex was found in PD [ 38 , 39 ]. The regions traditionally considered to be sensory-specific (e.g., the primary visual cortex) have been proven an audiovisual integration effect as compensatory phenomena [ 40 43 ]. Therefore, it is reasonable for the abnormal audiovisual integration in PD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%