2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162012000100018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison measures of maps generated by geostatistical methods

Abstract: This study uses several measures derived from the error matrix for comparing two thematic maps generated with the same sample set. The reference map was generated with all the sample elements and the map set as the model was generated without the two points detected as influential by the analysis of local influence diagnostics. The data analyzed refer to the wheat productivity in an agricultural area of 13.55 ha considering a sampling grid of 50 x 50 m comprising 50 georeferenced sample elements. The compariso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MZs generated by the original data without interpolation and the ones generated by ID, ISD and kriging were also compared by Kappa (K) and Tau indexes (Dalposso, Uribe-Opazo, Mercante, Johann, & Borssoi, 2012). The degree of agreement was classified according to Landis and Koch (1977) for K, namely, 0 < K ≤ 0.2: no agreement; 0.2 < K ≤ 0.4: weak; 0.4 < K ≤ 0.6: moderate: 0.6 < K ≤ 0.8: strong; 0.8 < K ≤ 1: very strong.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MZs generated by the original data without interpolation and the ones generated by ID, ISD and kriging were also compared by Kappa (K) and Tau indexes (Dalposso, Uribe-Opazo, Mercante, Johann, & Borssoi, 2012). The degree of agreement was classified according to Landis and Koch (1977) for K, namely, 0 < K ≤ 0.2: no agreement; 0.2 < K ≤ 0.4: weak; 0.4 < K ≤ 0.6: moderate: 0.6 < K ≤ 0.8: strong; 0.8 < K ≤ 1: very strong.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) The Kappa index has been used to measure the accuracy of thematic classifications (BAZZI et al, 2008;BASTIANI et al, 2012;DALPOSSO et al, 2012) and is recommended as an appropriate measure of accuracy for all elements from the error matrix. It was used to evaluate the spatial agreement among maps of more efficient MZs (Equation 6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local influence analysis (Fig. 3 As stated by Dalposso et al (2012), influential samples can change a decision in the determination of geostatistical models or the construction of thematic maps. Regarding the sample elements of soybean productivity identified as outliers (Fig.…”
Section: Local Influence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%