2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison model learning methods for methane emission prediction of reservoirs on a regional field scale: Performance and adaptation of methods with different experimental datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy in choosing a strategy allows implementing the selected methods to realize and create conducive and fun learning conditions. Students feel it is easier to realize the expected learning outcomes (Li et al, 2020). Therefore, learning video media were developed to increase students' motivation and interest in learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy in choosing a strategy allows implementing the selected methods to realize and create conducive and fun learning conditions. Students feel it is easier to realize the expected learning outcomes (Li et al, 2020). Therefore, learning video media were developed to increase students' motivation and interest in learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only to verify the emission estimates but also to verify the data inputs and assumptions made in the calculations/model. 29 Engineering calculations are benecial over both direct measurement and emission factors as they can be used to model and predict emissions, as has been done for other methane sources, such as reservoirs and dairy farms, 30,31 but the accuracy of any predictions is dependent on the accuracy of the input data and assumptions. This method can only provide emission estimates for known emissions sources and is unable to identify new emission sources.…”
Section: Engineering Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, remote sensing methods like Raman lidar technology (Veselovskii et al, 2019) and atmospheric chemistry-general circulation models (Zimmermann et al, 2018) have been instrumental. Machine learning models (Mehrdad et al, 2021), including artificial neural networks, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and support vector regression and decision tree methods (Li et al, 2020), modified grey radial basis function neural network model (Yang et al, 2020), 3-D modeling approach (Heimann et al, 2020), detailed site-level methane emission estimation model (Cardoso-Saldana & Allen, 2020), as well as Monte Carlo simulations (De Faria et al, 2015), have also been applied. Fiehn et al (2023) focused on quantifying and analyzing the isotopic signatures of methane emissions in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, using airborne and ground-based sampling during the CoMet campaign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%