2015
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2015.1033537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 1 M HCl and Mehlich 3 for Assessment of the Micronutrient Status of Polish Soils in the Context of Winter Wheat Nutritional Demands

Abstract: In Poland, assessment of the content of micronutrients in soil is performed using 1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) as an extractant. The objective of this study has been to check whether 1 M HCl can be replaced by Mehlich 3. In total, 330 soil samples were taken from fields cropped with winter wheat. Each sample was accompanied by a sample of wheat plant. The samples were from four groups of soils having various pH values-from acidic to alkaline soils. The suitability of the extractants was evaluated separately for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the checked extractants shared a questionable suitability to predict Fe availability for wheat in these soils. While we did not find significant relations for other nutrients, contrasting results have been reported for the extractable amounts of Cu, Fe and Mn and crop uptake (da Fonseca et al, 2010;Gediga et al, 2015;Korzeniowska and Stanislawska-Glubiak, 2015;Joshi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Wheat-total and Soil-extractable Nutrient Contentcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the checked extractants shared a questionable suitability to predict Fe availability for wheat in these soils. While we did not find significant relations for other nutrients, contrasting results have been reported for the extractable amounts of Cu, Fe and Mn and crop uptake (da Fonseca et al, 2010;Gediga et al, 2015;Korzeniowska and Stanislawska-Glubiak, 2015;Joshi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Wheat-total and Soil-extractable Nutrient Contentcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A significant relationship between soil extractable nutrients and crop response is one of the most important criteria for selecting soil extractants ( Benton‐Jones , 2003). In the last decade, biological availability and chemical extractability with multi‐element extractants have been compared for many nutrients and crops ( da Fonseca et al, 2010; Soriano‐Disla et al., 2010; Gediga et al, 2015; Korzeniowska and Stanislawska‐Glubiak , 2015; Joshi et al, 2017; Seth et al, 2017, 2018; Zhu et al, 2017; Asensio et al, 2018). However, this relationship remains unclear because it depends on plant species and soil characteristics and, moreover, soil nutrient bioavailability has been assessed by comparing crop‐total and soil nutrients extracted at a single temporal point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe forms susceptible to exctraction with 1M HCl was compared with the so-called limit numbers developed by the State Research Institute-Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (IUNG) in Puławy, Poland [63]. The method is commonly used in the research of soils in Poland to evaluate the content of the metal forms potentially available to plants [64][65][66]. The metal contents in soil samples and plant material were assayed applying the atomic absorption spectrometry method (AAS), with the SOLAAR S4 AA spectrometer (ThermoElemental, Cambridge, UK).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the digestion, Zn was determined using the flame atomic absorption spectrometry FAAS (flame atomic absorption spectrometry) method [51]. The available Zn in the soil was determined by Mehlich 3 method [52][53][54].…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%