2018
DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2018.1.20170345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 2 methods of neuropathic pain assessment in carpal tunnel syndrome and hand functions

Abstract: Conclusion:Although there was a significant correlation between the LANSS and PD-Q scores, the PD-Q scores revealed better correlation coefficients in VAS pain, DHI scores and SWM tests. In conclusion, the PD-Q seems to be better than the LANSS both in neuropathic pain and in detecting functions related to hand abilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of these assessment tools for defining the presence of the neuropathic component of pain has been performed in other studies. In particular, the greater sensitivity of LANSS has already been found in a study investigating pain type in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome ( Ceceli et al., 2018 ), while this finding has not been confirmed in patients with knee osteoarthritis ( Moreton et al., 2015 ). In our opinion, the higher percentage of neuropathic pain detected by LANSS in our study might be related to the physical examination section included in this tool, performed by a physician able to investigate for example allodynia and hyperalgesia by skin stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The comparison of these assessment tools for defining the presence of the neuropathic component of pain has been performed in other studies. In particular, the greater sensitivity of LANSS has already been found in a study investigating pain type in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome ( Ceceli et al., 2018 ), while this finding has not been confirmed in patients with knee osteoarthritis ( Moreton et al., 2015 ). In our opinion, the higher percentage of neuropathic pain detected by LANSS in our study might be related to the physical examination section included in this tool, performed by a physician able to investigate for example allodynia and hyperalgesia by skin stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The painDETECT questionnaire, used as a secondary outcome measure in this study, has previously been validated as a method of identifying the neuropathic component of pain in conditions such as low back pain and carpal tunnel syndrome. 35,36 It has also been used to differentiate patients with central sensitization of their pain in knee osteoarthritis. 37 There was no significant difference between the control and intervention groups in terms of painDETECT score at baseline, and initial painDETECT score did not predict improvement at 6 months in terms of reduction in VAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS was preferred since it is easily applicable, has good testretest reliability, and is a universally accepted global scale that can adequately reflect neuropathic pain in CTS. [ 14 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%