2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 2 treatment concepts for implant-supported bar-retained overdentures demonstrates equivalence regarding efficacy and safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the conclusions of his systematic review, Sadowsky () suggested multiple implants for mandibular OD when sensitive jaw anatomy, increased occlusal forces, or high retention needs are present or when implant length <8 mm or implant width <3.5 mm are employed. When two implants are used in the anterior mandible to retain an overdenture, solitary ball attachments appeared to be less costly, less technique sensitive, and more accommodating of tapered arches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conclusions of his systematic review, Sadowsky () suggested multiple implants for mandibular OD when sensitive jaw anatomy, increased occlusal forces, or high retention needs are present or when implant length <8 mm or implant width <3.5 mm are employed. When two implants are used in the anterior mandible to retain an overdenture, solitary ball attachments appeared to be less costly, less technique sensitive, and more accommodating of tapered arches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%